Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen
Podcasts AirTalk
Should California raise the bar for medical malpractice?
solid blue rectangular banner
()
AirTalk Tile 2024
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

Mar 28, 2014
Listen 11:50
Should California raise the bar for medical malpractice?
A measure on California’s November ballot would raise the cap on medical negligence lawsuits, including an increased cap on non-economic damages. Voters will be able to decide whether harm sustained from pain and suffering related to medical malpractice should be limited to $250,000 or raised to $1.
BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND - FEBRUARY 07:  A doctor at the Accident and Emergency department of the recently opened Birmingham Queen Elizabeth Hospital on February 7, 2011 in Birmingham, England. The new Queen Elizabeth Hospital accommodates 1,213 beds and 30 operating theatres. The super hospital has a 100-bed intensive care unit - the largest in Europe - and the largest single floor critical care unit in the world.  (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
A doctor at the Accident and Emergency department of the recently opened Birmingham Queen Elizabeth Hospital on February 7, 2011 in Birmingham, England.
(
Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
)

A measure on California’s November ballot would raise the cap on medical negligence lawsuits, including an increased cap on non-economic damages. Voters will be able to decide whether harm sustained from pain and suffering related to medical malpractice should be limited to $250,000 or raised to $1.

A measure on California’s November ballot would raise the cap on medical negligence lawsuits, including an increased cap on non-economic damages. Voters will be able to decide whether harm sustained from pain and suffering related to medical malpractice should be limited to $250,000 or raised to $1.1 million.

Critics say the initiative would cost the state’s healthcare system billions and complicate the process of fully incorporating California into the Affordable Care Act. The measure is being pursued by Consumer Watchdog.

The initiative’s main provision would change the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) -- a study released in 2010 from a group protecting MICRA, Californians Allied for Patient Protection, showed that even doubling the cap would add $9.5 billion in healthcare costs annually. CAAP is currently evaluating the proposed increase, and predicts that costs will go up significantly.

Should the cap on non-economic medical damages be raised to help people who have suffered a loss? Would increasing recompensation come at an undue cost to others? How should California handle medical malpractice funds?

Guest:

Jaime Court, President of Consumer Watchdog, which backs the new ballot initiative

Benjamin Fenton, healthcare attorney at Fenton Law Group in Los Angeles, which advises and consults with physicians on all legal issues pertaining to their practice.

Credits
Host, AirTalk
Host, All Things Considered, AirTalk Friday
Senior Producer, AirTalk & FilmWeek
Producer, AirTalk with Larry Mantle
Producer, AirTalk with Larry Mantle
Associate Producer, AirTalk & FilmWeek
Apprentice News Clerk, AirTalk
Apprentice News Clerk, FilmWeek